GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Books

All-Time High Scores
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005
Best Of 2004
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Books In Our Forums

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed books.

 

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

The Egyptologist
A Novel
by Arthur Phillips

The Egyptologist reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 69 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.0 out of 10
based on 17 reviews
read critic reviews
how did we calculate this?
based on 8 votes
read user comments
rate this book

A witty novel about an Egyptologist obsessed with finding the tomb of an apocryphal king. This darkly comic labyrinth of a story opens on the desert plains of Egypt in 1922, then winds its way from the slums of Australia to the ballrooms of Boston, by way of Oxford, the battlefields of the First World War, and a royal court in turmoil. [Random House]

Random House, 400 pages
08/31/2004
$24.95

ISBN: 1400062500

Fiction
General Literature & Fiction

What The Critics Said

All reviews are classified as one of five grades: Outstanding (4 points), Favorable (3), Mixed (2), Unfavorable (1) and Terrible (0). To calculate the Metascore, we divide total points achieved by the total points possible (i.e., 4 x the number of reviews), with the resulting percentage (multiplied by 100) being the Metascore. Learn more...

Chicago Sun-Times Roger K. Miller
Nothing or nobody is what it seems, in this awesomely clever fiction.
Read Full Review
San Francisco Chronicle Andrew Roe
A wonder, a work of imaginative prowess that more than fulfills the promise of "Prague." It's ambitious. It's inventive. It's challenging. And it's the kind of book that puts a writer's career on track without his having to endure murmurings of slipping on the second try.
Read Full Review
Washington Post Barbara Mertz
A tour de force of plotting and narrative technique; the intertwining storylines lead with mounting inevitability to one of the most horrendously, hideously humorous endings in modern fiction.
Read Full Review
USA Today Melanie Danburg
It's well worth the careful excavation it requires.
Read Full Review
Village Voice Alexis Soloski
Phillips succeeds best when he leaves mystery alone to linger over wordplay, exotic detail, and remarkable acts of self-deceit and self-creation.
Read Full Review
Wall Street Journal John Freeman
Trapped inside this maze of unreliable testimony is a thoughtful meditation on the untrustworthiness of the past.
Read Full Review
Publishers Weekly
Phillips is a master manipulator, able to assume a dozen convincingly different voices at will, and his book is vastly entertaining.
Read Full Review
Salon Laura Miller
It's an adventure in unreliable narration, and replete with old-fashioned charms.
Read Full Review
Christian Science Monitor Ron Charles
Beneath all his comic ventriloquism and ribald parody of academia, Phillips is reaching for something more profound: the sad ways people represent and misrepresent themselves, shifting awkwardly from confidence to self-delusion.
Read Full Review
Kirkus Reviews
Phillips's formidable research and witty prose make this one well worth your time. He's quite possibly a major novelist in the making.
Read Full Review
Library Journal Edward Cone
Unlike "Prague," whose characters moved at a leisurely pace, this work offers, quite tongue in cheek, a tableau of action and adventure in a 1920s setting. Highly recommended for everyone in search of buried treasure. [July 2004, p.73]
Los Angeles Times Heller McAlpin
Phillips relies on several running gags to propel his plot, some of which show early signs of decay from overexposure. Astute readers may surmise where he's going early on -- leading to some impatience with the extended ruse.
Read Full Review
Chicago Tribune Claire Dederer
Astute readers will solve one of the major mysteries about halfway through the novel, if not before. Once that particular game is up, it gets a little tiresome to watch Phillips spin out his plot. Meanwhile, we have to slog through a lot of details of Egyptology that are, frankly, on the boring side.
Read Full Review
Booklist Joanne Wilkinson
Some readers might find the amount of pharaonic minutiae tedious reading, but it all serves to support the novel's shocking yet entirely credible ending and its themes of the longing for immortality and the nature of identity. [1 June 2004, p.1671]
Read Full Review
The New York Times Book Review Tom Bissel
Whereas ''Prague'' seemed like a beautiful, riffing, agitated, worldly novel, The Egyptologist has an occasionally ossified texture, despite its many moments of genuinely high comedy.
Read Full Review
The New Yorker
Unfortunately, he tricks up his plot by adding a dull detective who labors to expose Trilipush's lies, and by stealing a twist from "The Talented Mr. Ripley."
Read Full Review
The New York Times Michiko Kakutani
Mr. Phillips's own storytelling, sadly, grows increasingly self-indulgent and bloated as the book progresses, and combined with the reader's knowledge of the ''surprise ending,'' it makes for a disappointing conclusion to a novel that got off to such a promising and bouncy start.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this book is 6.0 (out of 10) based on 8 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Dan B. gave it a6:
Incredibly imagined and written, but way, way, waaaaaaaaaaaay bloated. The main character, Trilipush, is incredibly obnoxious, and when obnoxious characters are well written, it makes for some tedious reading. Also, someone bellow hit the nail on the head in saying it's funnier in the thinking than in the reading -- this book ought to be very funny, and many many times, in fact almost at all times, it's nearly drowning in humor and irony, but it's just so damn overlong. And repetitive. If the book shed 50+ pages, it might be a 9. All that said, it's a really really impressive book, just not a really really readable one.

James S gave it a9:
Overlong, but imbued with a real sense of humor and pathos.

Esther N gave it an8:
Flawed. The lengthy Egyptian section is not nearly as interesting to the reader as it was the author. Despite that, a book that is enjoyable and accomplished, but fails by one wanting it to be more.

J Styles gave it a2:
A tedious pastiche that's funnier in the thinking about than in the reading. (Genuinely comic novels are invariably funnier in the reading than the plot.) On page 334 of the paperback edition, there is a nice line: "When it comes to incomplete history, one needs to encircle the truth, not bound at it like an amorous kangaroo." Phillipps is clearly in randy bounder mode here.

Steve gave it a3:
wordy, long-winded, obvious

Geneva D gave it a9:
funny

Discuss this book in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use